DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
wine Goreme ry A ate ma tity
fo ee WI de,
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. 9526-12
6 Aug 13
|
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 August 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in.
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0654 d@td 11
Jun 13, a copy of which is attached.
Bfter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will ‘be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
Docket No. 9526-12
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\S (dol
wD Duwi \
W. DEAN PRETHFER
Executive reactor
Enclosure: CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0654 dtd 11 Jun 13
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08830 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0583 dtd 22 May 13 and CNRFC Email dtd 25 Jul 13, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2891-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0846 dtd 24 Jul 13, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04233-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1885 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/c537 of 14 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 15 0 existence of probable materia Enclosure: Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9235 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore I signed on for four years into the Navy Reserves to meet this stipulation.” you further claim that after your wife applied for and was accepted at a university, that “It has now come to my attention, as I tried to transfer my benefits and got denied, that I was wrongfully informed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11287 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0194 dated 4 March 2015 and CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0562 dated 16 May 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR11287-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2082 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC memo 5420 Ser N1/1169 of 20 Nov 14, a copy of which is attached. Under the governing regulations, to be eligible to transfer benefits, a member must be on active duty or in the selective reserve at the time of the election to transfer. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9487 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/126 of 7 Feb 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04694-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and appiicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3789 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014.. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Letter 5420 Ser N1/1161 — a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.